← Awesome REA

Self-built Electron app / 海外Tech Radar / JA

Test static analysis against a self-built app

ENGLISH SUMMARY

Test static analysis against a self-built app

A Japanese hands-on article checks REA's module and IPC findings against a four-file Electron-style app and records unresolved dynamic paths.

The question

How much of a known application structure can REA identify?

The workflow

  1. Prepare a small, self-built four-file application.
  2. Run analyze-javascript-application and inspect its JSON output.
  3. Compare findings with the known structure and record unresolved paths.

Findings & output

The author reports detecting a window, exposed API, and IPC channel, while some string-composed paths remained unresolved.

Evidence scope

This is static CLI inspection; the author did not test agent registration, native decompilation, or runtime behavior.

中文摘要

用自己写的应用，检验静态分析的边界

日文实践文章用一个四文件 Electron 风格应用核对 REA 的模块与 IPC 分析，同时记录动态路径没被解析的情况。

调查的问题

REA 能识别自己已知的应用结构到什么程度？

怎么做的

  1. 准备自己写的四文件应用。
  2. 运行 analyze-javascript-application，查看 JSON 结果。
  3. 用已知代码结构核对结果，记录漏掉的动态路径。

发现与产出

作者报告识别了窗口、暴露 API 与 IPC 通道；部分字符串拼接路径没有解析出来。

证据范围

是静态 CLI 调查，作者未验证 Agent 注册、原生反编译或实际运行行为。

Original sources / 原始来源

日本語 · hands-on article

Checked / 核对 2026-10-12 · Author report / 作者实践